Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Dealing with the "Meta Menace"

The most recent issue of The Lawyer's Weekly (vol. 26, no. 17) has an article entitled The meta menace: what you can't see could come back to haunt you which discusses the many problems that can arise when legal professionals forget to clean up the metadata embedded into computer files before distributing documents.

Metadata can include changes made, names of previous document authors, document revisions and versions, and hidden text.

"Problems can arise if law firms send files to clients or opposing counsel that still contains markup. It may as well be hard copy full of sticky notes. Consequences may include a compromised bargaining position and violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). Laws governing metadata are still in their infancy, but early precedents permit tech-savvy counsellors to freely read any metadata they find, much as they would a forgotten sticky".

Earlier Library Boy posts on potential problems with metadata include:

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share Subscribe
posted by Michel-Adrien at 5:19 pm

1 Comments:

Blogger Dominic Jaar said...

I'm always suprised to read articles about metadata. It seems we have been repeating the same thing over and over again to our fellow lawyers... As with anything, we will need a big case in which big money is involved or a lawyer is disbarred before we are listened to!

As I noted on Slaw:

Metadata raise numerous issues when it comes to discovery in the course of litigation. So far, there is not much case law in Canada regarding the issue. Even on the OBA E-discovery page, there is no case about metadata. Nevertheless, canadians can find some guidelines in article 12 of the GUIDELINES FOR THE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS IN ONTARIO which provides that:

"Unless it is material to resolving the dispute, there is no obligation to preserve and produce metadata absent agreement of the parties or order of the court."

This choice is different from the one made in the american Sedona Principles. Which direction will the canadian courts take?

7:45 am  

Post a comment

<< Home